Development of a Remote Three-Phase Motor Wiring Practice Tool Using ESP32, LabVIEW, Wokwi, and Adafruit IO
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The practical application of three-phase induction motor wiring is an essential part of mechatronic engineering education. The integration of IoT-based tools and simulation software such as Wokwi, LabVIEW, and Adafruit IO enables remote monitoring and control of motor wiring practices. This article discusses the development of a remote three-phase induction motor wiring tool utilizing the ESP32 microcontroller, LabVIEW for real-time monitoring and control, Wokwi for circuit wiring simulation, and Adafruit IO for cloud-based data communication. Testing shows that the system effectively facilitates remote motor control and wiring simulation, providing a flexible and accessible learning environment.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
J. A. Asumadu and R. Tanner, “Remote wiring and measurement laboratory,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., pp. 8565–8571, 2001, doi: 10.18260/1-2--9736.
N. Fujii and N. Koike, “Work in progress - A new time-sharing remote laboratory e-learning system for hardware design and experiment of digital circuits,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2005, pp. 19–20, 2005, doi: 10.1109/fie.2005.1612125.
R. Tanner et al., “A Web-based electrical and electronics remote wiring and measurement laboratory (RwmLAB) instrument,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2005, [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1381796
J. Ma and J. V. Nickerson, “Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 38, no. 3, p. 1, 2006, doi: 10.1145/1132960.1132961.
B. Balamuralithara and P. C. Woods, “Virtual laboratories in engineering education: the simulation lab and remote lab,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108–118, 2009, doi: 10.1002/cae.20186.
A. Rojko, D. Hercog, and K. Jezernik, “E-training in mechatronics using innovative remote laboratory,” Math. Comput. Simul., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 508–516, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.10.017.
M. Stefanovic, V. Cvijetkovic, M. Matijevic, and V. Simic, “A LabVIEW-based remote laboratory experiments for control engineering education,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 538–549, 2011, doi: 10.1002/cae.20334.
M. A. Andújar, J. M.; Mejías, A.; Márquez, “Augmented Reality for the Improvement of Remote Laboratories: An Augmented Remote Laboratory IEEE Transactions on Education,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 492–500, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5607327
L. Claesson and L. Håkansson, “Using an Online Remote Laboratory for Electrical Experiments in Upper Secondary Education,” Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng., vol. 8, no. S2, p. 24, 2012, doi: 10.3991/ijoe.v8is2.1941.
L. De La Torre et al., “Providing collaborative support to virtual and remote laboratories,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 312–323, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2013.20.
B. Popović, N. Popović, D. Mijić, S. Stankovski, and G. Ostojić, “Remote control of laboratory equipment for basic electronics courses: A LabVIEW-based implementation,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 21, no. S1, pp. E110–E120, 2013, doi: 10.1002/cae.20531.
Y. Liang and G. P. Liu, Design of remote 3d virtual laboratory for education on control system experimentation, vol. 10, no. PART 1. IFAC, 2013. doi: 10.3182/20130828-3-UK-2039.00021.
D. Chaos, J. Chacón, J. A. Lopez-Orozco, and S. Dormido, “Virtual and remote robotic laboratory using EJS, MATLAB and LabVIEW,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 2595–2612, 2013, doi: 10.3390/s130202595.
M. Tawfik et al., “Virtual instrument systems in reality (VISIR) for remote wiring and measurement of electronic circuits on breadboard,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 60–72, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2012.20.
B. R. P. chandra, K. P. Geevarghese, and K. V. Gangadharan, “Design and Implementation of Remote Mechatronics Laboratory for e-Learning Using LabVIEW and Smartphone and Cross-platform Communication Toolkit (SCCT),” Procedia Technol., vol. 14, pp. 108–115, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.015.
Y.-L. Cheng et al., “We are IntechOpen , the world ’ s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists , for scientists TOP 1 %,” Intech, vol. 11, no. tourism, p. 13, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-biometric-technologies/liveness-detection-in-biometrics
V. M. Cvjetković and U. Stanković, “Arduino based physics and engineering remote laboratory,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 545, pp. 560–574, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50340-0_51.
M. Bjelica and M. Simić-Pejović, “Experiences with remote laboratory,” Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0020720917750960.
P. Nedungadi, M. V. Ramesh, P. Pradeep, and R. Raman, “Pedagogical support for collaborative development of virtual and remote labs amrita VLCAP,” Cyber-Physical Lab. Eng. Sci. Educ., pp. 219–240, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-76935-6_9.
A. Fernández-Pacheco, S. Martin, and M. Castro, “Implementation of an arduino remote laboratory with raspberry pi,” IEEE Glob. Eng. Educ. Conf. EDUCON, vol. April-2019, pp. 1415–1418, 2019, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725030.