Performance Analysis of Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) Model for Remaining Useful Life Prediction on Turbofan Engine
Main Article Content
Abstract
Accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction is critical for the predictive maintenance and operational safety of aircraft turbofan engines. This research develops and evaluates a stacked Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for RUL prediction using the NASA C-MAPSS FD001 dataset as a fundamental case study. A systematic data preprocessing pipeline was employed, including sensor selection, RUL value clipping at 130 cycles, and feature normalization to prepare the data for modeling. The LSTM model was trained with regularization techniques and an EarlyStopping callback to ensure robustness and prevent overfitting. Evaluation results on the unseen test data show the final model achieved a solid and competitive performance with a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 15.22 and a PHM08 Score of 311.20. These results demonstrate that a well-configured LSTM architecture provides a reliable baseline for engine prognostic tasks, exhibiting strong generalization capabilities on new data.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
R. Moradi and K. M. Groth, “Modernizing risk assessment: A systematic integration of PRA and PHM techniques,” Reliab. Eng. & Syst. Saf., vol. 204, p. 107194, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107194.
M. Wu, Q. Ye, J. Mu, Z. Fu, and Y. Han, “Remaining useful life prediction via a Data-Driven Deep Learning Fusion Model-CALAP,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 112085–112096, 2023, doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3322733.
A. Saxena, K. Goebel, D. Simon, and N. Eklund, “Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation,” in International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 2008. doi: 10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414.
C.-S. Hsu and J.-R. Jiang, “Remaining useful life estimation using long short-term memory deep learning,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI), 2018, pp. 58–61. doi: 10.1109/icasi.2018.8394326.
L. R. Rodrigues, “Remaining useful life prediction for Multiple-Component systems based on a System-Level performance indicator,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 141–150, 2017, doi: 10.1109/tmech.2017.2713722.
Y. Zhang, R. Xiong, H. He, and M. G. Pecht, “Lithium-Ion battery remaining useful life prediction with Box–Cox transformation and Monte Carlo simulation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 1585–1597, 2018, doi: 10.1109/tie.2018.2808918.
D. Wang and K.-L. Tsui, “Brownian motion with adaptive drift for remaining useful life prediction: Revisited,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 99, pp. 691–701, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.015.